Tucker Talks to Jason Whitlock
As usual, I post these Tucker drops as a courtesy to my subscribers who do not use social media — it’s a tradition around here. If you’d like to opt out, you may do so in your subscriber settings, top right.
Tucker asks the first question, " Is she going to win?” Whitlock answers, “Are we going to lose?”
Tucker and Jason Whitlock reacting live to the speech by Kamala Harris:
Does Comrade Kamala have a drinking problem or does she believe in the collectivist faith that has never functioned in 400 years?
Take a look at her videos – you be the judge – why are they keeping her hidden?
Why are they only having her do the same stump speech over and over?
Why are they keeping her from doing interviews and news conferences?
Here’s a couple of good responses below to something I posted online to a video of Kim Iversen about how “Kamala is not a communist.” and then proceeded to say the left traded class for race so she’s a “Woke Marxist.” Someone else pointed out that Marxism was also class based which is true so it could then be just as true to say she’s a “Woke Communist.” I like the sound of “Woke Marxist” better though because it sounds like she’s more radically deranged which in fact she is.
“There is a difference between economic Marxism and cultural Marxism. The pathways are the same. That is to say, the MEANS in which each one succeeds is exactly the same. Instead of pitting "classes" against one another, simply pit "races"" against one another. The end result is the same.”
“Communists USE and subscribe to the theoretical framework of Marxism to achieve communism. How is she not either? Class (race) struggle, constant critique of capitalism, materialist interpretation of history, the concept of "surplus value", and ideas of revolutionary change; "I'm offering a new way forward". Kamala's father was a revolutionary Marxist, who taught her. How is she not Marxist? And, since Marxism is the theoretical vehicle for communism, how is she not a communist?”