If you only have one bullet, shoot the traitor instead of the enemy. RINO's are so much more dangerous than the lunatic left. Nothing will change until the swamp is drained.
I’m late in posting, but since Harmeet Dhillon is a favorite, I had to honor her. I keep anything she writes and watch her on TV . Dhillon IS Presidential material. I, too, thought McDaniel couldn’t possibly be in again with the results in the 2022 midterms. I, too, was shocked that she was voted in so fast.
It is a huge bummer, indeed – but only for the moment.
Remember, the RNC is little more than the institutional representation of a billionaire boys club – I think it's a lot like the commissioner's office of MLB or the NFL.
In those two organizations, the Commissioner, selected by the owners or their proxies, exists more to present the right image to the public. This to protect the owners' free rein to generate as much revenue and profit as possible, and while that isn't necessarily a bad thing, because that which the league receives from licensing, and even that from broadcast rights gets smaller with each new franchise, they have to exploit state, county and municipal governments to fund the construction of stadiums in which their teams play while the franchises reap the revenue these venues generate resulting in pure profit.
Oh, sure, the league will chip in a little bit, and so will the team – the cost of new access, and infrastructure to the public, and behind the scenes, generous financial contributions to the politicians championing the economic benefit of the team remaining in its current location (a benefit that has been proven on numerous occasions to be negligible, at best).
The owners also have to exploit that which makes their product attractive – the players. In the case of the NFL, only the prospect of devastatingly negative PR re: CTE and how the league largely ignored it hoping it would go away forced it to create a fund for the families of those players who suffered from it, and suffer, still. Never mind that the fund is barely a drop in the bucket compared to the league's annual revenue. Ironically, as the league has sought to "protect" its players on the field through injury protocols and rule changes, those same rule changes have so sanitized the game that it is not enjoyable to watch, any longer. This gives rise to a completely different topic of an obsession with safety and risk mitigation, so I'll stop, here.
Getting back to the RNC, it and its chair are much like a quarterback – when the party does well in elections, it gets far too much credit, and when the party performs particularly abysmally as it did this past fall, it gets far too much blame. Yes, the $ is helpful, but financial help is also available from the congressional caucus funds in the House and Senate, and any number of PACs.
In a more just world, the outcome would ultimately depend on how the candidate performs on the campaign trail, and how effectively he/she can get the message out – except in the real world, Democrats own the local election machinery, and they are more loyal to THEIR ideology than are the Republicans (whose base is constituted of conservatives, largely by default) because those whose real allegiance is the party of People Who Just Want To Be Left The Hell Alone, aren't ideologues. Small government, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness aren't subject to an ideology – they're just the values that most Americans hold dear.
Unless Harmeet had some serious dirt on the voting donors, McDaniel was always going to win – and even if she had, there would be the question of just what kind of compromise was made that would get enough of them to toss Ronna overboard – it hardly warrants consideration.
That being said, your admonition ought to be tattooed on the forehead of every Republican candidate serious about winning the election (assuming that Republicans CAN win elections, going forward):
"If the GOP starts to focus on the positive and not the negative, they can help save this country from the Left. And it needs to be saved...As long as you’re selling a positive and not a negative, you will attract voters in the middle. Be the sanity party. And then they will fear you."
Spoken from the laptop class, working from home in a service industry. Trump united the so-called nationalists and native capitalists while shoving the multinationalists to the rear by cutting the corporate tax rate in half, de-regulating 10s of thousands of industry killing regulations, and most importantly unleashing American energy for the first time in 40 years. These actions led to organic capital investing in Ameria rather than China, he had to be removed like Nixon.
We were independent, we are now dependent again on everything and the current Uniparty is getting paid to keep it that way.
Sir, I apologize as my language wasn't meant to attack you personally, just to highlight how the media is really misinforming good people like you.
Nancy Mace is a Trump hater without good reason. PBS is the Leftist narrative; 80% of the American People do not support baby killing in the 3rd trimester - like the rest of the world - and the same percentage polls to support women's health in the case of rape or incest or ectopic issues. We have always been that way even though the media has its financial interest to stoke the flames and we need to realize it.
In my 53 years on this earth I have NEVER met or heard a person suggest that a woman should die giving birth - in any country I have lived. Common sense yields that there should be options and that is what most of us subscribe to. We don't, however, subscribe to legalized baby killing at any point as contraception; there are countless options for women in the first 16 weeks to make a choice.
Mace's definition - and perhaps yours - of the 'extreme right' are way off base so please keep in touch as I am one who would meet her false description of it.
I was afraid the day would come as you hint at: where those depending on one government check or another (eg defense, teachers, welfare, food stamps, fed/stare/local jobs. Etc) would so our number real tax payers that they would turn the country communist/socialist, like China, EU, Africa, Canada, South America.
What a great newsletter. I too am pulling for Dhillon. If the Republican party reelects Ronna McDaniels, they've pretty much signaled what they think of independents like me and what they see themselves as (an underdog party that's happy losing elections and not fulfilling promises as long as the donations keep rolling in, and in fact, that is their raison d'etre).
As for Putin, everyone arguing that we need to keep supplying Ukraine wants two separate paradoxes not to be, well, paradoxes:
(1) Putin is *losing* in Ukraine to a scrappy homegrown poorly equipped military, but somehow he's going to take over the rest of Europe.
(2) Putin is just mad enough to invade Ukraine for no reason and with no exit strategy, but not mad enough to start a nuclear war if he feels cornered.
Those two do not work in any reality and give lie to the idea that we absolutely have to continue supplying Ukraine, or that it's even wise to be waving this red flag in front of this particular bull. We'd be better off dragging Zelensky to the negotiating table and stopping his deadly grift (and, no, I've never trusted him).
Myself and 4 of my brothers served active duty military. Poor kids die while woke rich kids go to college and work for the government or their daddy and mommy.
I think looking at this loss of life and treasure, future historians will label the Russia Hoax as one of the deadliest political decisions ever. Please note that not a single person who is responsible for this has been prosecuted, let alone put in jail. We have a new aristocracy that is above law.
I am a Conservative and probably disagree with you on many issues and I think your argument for the GOP to focus on the positive rather than dwell on the negative is overly simplistic. There are some very bad things going on that need to be called out. But having said all that, I also believe you have an open mind and we could probably come to some sort of compromise on most of our disagreements.
I absolutely agree that McDaniel needs to be out as head of the RNC. Why anyone would think that she is the best person to lead the party after her disastrous tenure is beyond me. I think you're probably right that Harmeet Dhillon is the best person available for the job.
You might not be a foreign policy expert Sasha but I also think your instincts on the Ukraine war are spot on. We are being lied to by both parties when they say that this a war about democracy. I think Defense Secretary Austin was being honest when he said that the point of this war was to weaken Russia. I have also heard the argument that this war is a bargain for us because for just a few billion dollars we are able to inflict great damage on Russia's ability to wage war. That this war will also end up with the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians (at least) and the annihilation of Ukraine seems to be of little concern. As you mention, there is also the very real risk this war will escalate beyond control causing unimaginable destruction. This is a bad situation which we are making worse. On the contrary Sasha, I wish people would take your advice on this war.
As I said I am a Conservative and also a Republican, but like you recent events have caused me to change my way of looking at things. I am much more skeptical of corporate power now than I used to be and am much less trustworthy of our intelligence and investigative agencies. I think there should be a number of things disillusioned people on both the right and left can agree on. I know the history of third parties is not a happy one and I'm still hoping that the GOP can be changed from within but I'm not sure anymore.
Thank you. Truly, no one should listen to me when it comes to GOP policy and such since I am only giving my perceptions as a former Democrat. I can't possibly know what would drive votes. And thanks re: the war but I fear there are too many people who seem to want it to head in that direction.
Again on the contrary Sasha, you have an open mind (a rare commodity indeed) and common sense and that makes you worth listening to whether you're a former Democrat or not. A long time ago I was also a Democrat (I'm originally from Rhode Island and that was the law) and I've gone through a couple of evolutions in my political thinking. I think the opinions of people who have rethought their positions based on evidence are the people that need to be listened to the most right now.
If only those donors were still interested in protecting American interests rather than chasing 'the unlimited Asia(China) market' while giving away our intellectual property to them for a quick 'cost savings'.
If you think that there aren't ballot control issues in the only country that doesn't have chain-of-custody of our ballot boxes you are extremely out of touch; go be a republican poll watcher in a large metro area next election and report how you were kicked out after they quit counting when a candidate was up 700K votes and then 'lost'. Kari Lake in AZ two months ago.
If you do not care what is happening you have lost once again.
Brilliant comment. The theft was so blatant, so obvious, and affidavits were turned into any place that would receive them. There is no chain of custody of our ballots . That’s why when the voting machines failed to
register the Republican ballots, they were piled up in bags, and handed off TWiCE to some people who are not even named, and sent to a place not even known, and probably were not even opened to count (This
is in Arizona)nor was there probably Republican poll watcher as a witness.
Instead the software for tracking was arranged to say that the ballot had been opened and vote registered, when really the owner of the ballot had only signed in. We all need to get really into this voting malfeasance.
There are Election Deniers because of Election Connivers. I don’t mind being called an Election Denier. Read “Rigged”.
They're probably both very nice people, so absent any serious negatives, the question to ask ourselves is why should we continue to support an individual who has not been able to achieve the goals and objectives for which the job exists. It's like continuing to elect politicians who go to Washington term after term and fail time after time to do the things we sent them there to do....(oh, wait, we do that all the time, don't we?)
While I am not registered as a Republican - Texas doesn't register voters by party - I'm much closer to them than to Democrats. As such, I don't give two hoots in a windstorm who is head of the Republican Party. They're mainly a figurehead anyway. As for Dillon, that she is an immigrant may turn people off. (I see that McDaniel won so that's now a moot issue. This brings me to Ukraine.
Now, I've been in a war, I write about war and know what war is about - and I know that Ukraine is NOT our war. It's not "the West's" war either. The problems between Russia and Ukraine are just that, a regional issue dating back for centuries. Blame the Soviets for creating Ukraine in the first place. Putin has accomplished his objectives - driving Ukraine out of Donbas. The ONLY reasons Kiev is still fighting because we keep giving them weapons and because Zelensky is a superstar as you said,. The man is an actor and thinks he has to be center stage. I suspect Ukraine will get tired of him soon and take him out.
I wouldn't worry too much about nuclear war. Putin is not going to use nukes in Ukraine for the same reason the Russian Air Force is not playing a large role - they're being held back for a war with NATO. Nukes are last resort weapons and Russia would only use them as a last resort against the United States and NATO. Hopefully, we won't get the idea we can use them first. For that matter, there is nuclear war and then there is nuclear war. Russia (the United States and others) have low-yield nuclear weapons designed to be used on a battlefield. They could be used without causing worldwide problems. It's the ICBMs and other high yield weapons that are the problem. Russia has the ability to destroy the West. Theoretically, we can destroy them as well but Russia is a large country and their civilization goes back for centuries. We would very likely come out on the losing end. Don't worry about it - the world has been under the threat of nuclear war since 1945.
No, Leftists have not become fascist, they are acting just like the Soviets, Chinese, Vietnamese, Laotian, Cambodians, Cubans and others rooted in Marxism did and do. American Leftists are seeking to become dictators.
Stop saying Republicans lost the last election - they didn't. They now control the House. Biden won't be able to pass another piece of legislation. So what that Democrats control the Senate? There is still one Democrat and a now-Independent who are just as likely to vote with Republicans as with them.
Sam, I always learn at least one thing from you comments and this time I learned 3. Btw - am really enjoying your book and am learning a lot there as well. Thanks much.
This Desert Storm vet thanks you wonderful Vietnam guys and gals for training us and a country to do it right. Welcome Home; we put you guys in the front of our parades.
Compelling argument and I am now onboard. Kinda funny too that you did a post on Influencers and now just flexed it. Lol. Gonna buy more Mr Pillows (they really are good) and support Dhillon. Btw when the so-called Liberals became the biggest defenders of the FBI, CIA, DOJ, DOD and endless war, they also stopped being liberal or freedom loving.
Many thanks for the Mace transcript. I really like her and hope she has a bright future in politics. She'll certainly get some of my money going forward, that is, if any is left after Uncle Zel comes by again.
I think Dhillon was speaking to Representative Mace and voters like you. It was a call to the disgruntled of every viewpoint in the party. She allied herself with the ardent Trump supporters because they were the ones who could challenge the structure. They recognized a true reform candidate or they would have supported Mike Lindell. I don't think she was anyone's tool. The big donors won that race.
I don't think Donald Trump is the face of the Republican Party going forward either. Frankly, I don't know whom to support. I know, with the certain exception of Tulsi Gabbard, the Democrats would ensure our decline as a decent and just society. We need someone to make us believe in the idea of America. I'm am old man so my nostalgia is no vision for our woke and socialist illness.
I really wish Ronna wasn’t elected again. I really like that she led Trump’s victory in MI in 2016, but I’m not convinced she’s able to get our candidates over the finish line nationally.
I also like the idea of talking about the positive - what R’s are FOR, not what they are against. Yes, the party has DEEP problems, but some of this is has always been just basic marketing and PR.
People want to feel good about voting for their team. I just don’t get excited voting for R’s because they aren’t as crappy as the Dems. I’ve voted for 3rd parties or not voted in races because both major party candidates just suck and I won’t vote for ‘the less worse candidate’ anymore. If the candidate is bad, they don’t deserve a vote, regardless of party. You can say I was fed up before it was cool.
I just can’t bring myself to say I’m independent because if our candidates actually believed and advocated for the party’s platform, then I wouldn’t have a problem with the party. But candidates need to offer voters more than ‘I’m not a social justice freak’ and ‘tax cuts’. If you can’t make arguments that actually deal with the questions that people are asking, then what are you doing?
People in my generation (X) are a lot more secular and Republicans need to learn the language. You can be culturally conservative w/o being Uber conservative or religious. A lot of my peers have issues with the institutional church and the critiques are well earned and with the younger adults, church isn’t even on the radar. I just don’t think the R’s get the reality of our culture sometimes. They have their bubble and stick to it. I’ve always just wanted to get to 50% + 1 - and that means you need the party to appeal to people outside of the club. And that’s always been the problem ---> They talk a good game about ‘the big tent’, but well, it’s really not that big. They can’t just talk a good game, they need to execute. And usually- they can’t execute.
I doubt Ronna can keep ‘the band’ together ‘for one more election cycle’. Do we really buy that NT’s will vote and work for Trump if he gets the nomination? Independents? I mean, it’s in their name ‘Never’ ‘Trump’. I tend to take them at their word at this point. Do we really believe the Trumpers will support the nominee, if the nominee isn’t Trump? Some might, but I don’t buy we’ll get to 50+ 1, given that it’s Ronna who couldn’t deliver in 18, 20 or 22. I’d love to be proven wrong. I’m just not optimistic.
Also the American flag comment caught my eye. I lived in a big city for 30 years and towards the end, I’d never have flown an American flag. I just didn’t have the energy to explain I wasn’t a MAGA terrorist or (gasp) a Republican.
My political trajectory follows yours Sasha. I’m out wandering around in the weeds, still a liberal from the 80’s wondering where I can put my “question authority” sticker these days.
I live in the country now and I have my American flag flying. So far no one has cancelled me.
Awesome, Sasha. On Ukraine, just being pragmatic: Putin's win is the globalists' loss. But the losses of this extremely priviledged, wealthy group are nobody else's problem. They help with nothing in any case.
Informative column Sasha, thank you. Many thanks also for approving me on Twitter. We may not see eye to eye on some social issues but it is so satisfying to read commentary that is insightful and attempts to build meaningful dialog and actual trust between people of contending views.
Like you I, a rib rock Republican since the year of our Lord 1992, was truly disappointed in the re election of McDaniels as RNC chair. Reading about her financial excesses was the final act of hubris that made me petition our state committee. The RNC spent so much more on gifts and feting large donors with zero results as opposed to the Democrats. I certainly agreed that we needed people like Dhillon to reach out to independent and dependent moderate voters. The base has to be expanded. We have to realize that a lot of people depend on the federal and state largesse and they vote their pocketbooks when that voting booth curtin is drawn closed MAGA on the outside and love me some SSD on the inside.
We also have to lose some of the establishment voices. Too in step with Democrat war mongers that I feel will be disastrous for our country this year when Ukraine turns sour. Watch President Biden hide behind Lindsey Graham and the Bush Squad when Americans die. Tucker Carlson and Tulsi Gabbard will be the only ones that can say "I told you so" then.
It was obvious, and I thought it was really going to happen, that we needed new leadership and really expand the big tent. The populists were tossed and so we're the small donors. Kinda knew it when the meeting was held at the Waldorf Astoria. It's a club and we ain't in it.
Well that was fast. The election is over and Ronna McDaniel won. That's a huge bummer.
Agree. 😩
Too bad, GOP missed a great opportunity to change direction. I'm disappointed in current leadership and lack of vision. Stay tuned...
I couldn't agree with you more! So disappointing.
If you only have one bullet, shoot the traitor instead of the enemy. RINO's are so much more dangerous than the lunatic left. Nothing will change until the swamp is drained.
Shoot yourself first
I’m late in posting, but since Harmeet Dhillon is a favorite, I had to honor her. I keep anything she writes and watch her on TV . Dhillon IS Presidential material. I, too, thought McDaniel couldn’t possibly be in again with the results in the 2022 midterms. I, too, was shocked that she was voted in so fast.
yes. GOP learned nothing.
It is a huge bummer, indeed – but only for the moment.
Remember, the RNC is little more than the institutional representation of a billionaire boys club – I think it's a lot like the commissioner's office of MLB or the NFL.
In those two organizations, the Commissioner, selected by the owners or their proxies, exists more to present the right image to the public. This to protect the owners' free rein to generate as much revenue and profit as possible, and while that isn't necessarily a bad thing, because that which the league receives from licensing, and even that from broadcast rights gets smaller with each new franchise, they have to exploit state, county and municipal governments to fund the construction of stadiums in which their teams play while the franchises reap the revenue these venues generate resulting in pure profit.
Oh, sure, the league will chip in a little bit, and so will the team – the cost of new access, and infrastructure to the public, and behind the scenes, generous financial contributions to the politicians championing the economic benefit of the team remaining in its current location (a benefit that has been proven on numerous occasions to be negligible, at best).
The owners also have to exploit that which makes their product attractive – the players. In the case of the NFL, only the prospect of devastatingly negative PR re: CTE and how the league largely ignored it hoping it would go away forced it to create a fund for the families of those players who suffered from it, and suffer, still. Never mind that the fund is barely a drop in the bucket compared to the league's annual revenue. Ironically, as the league has sought to "protect" its players on the field through injury protocols and rule changes, those same rule changes have so sanitized the game that it is not enjoyable to watch, any longer. This gives rise to a completely different topic of an obsession with safety and risk mitigation, so I'll stop, here.
Getting back to the RNC, it and its chair are much like a quarterback – when the party does well in elections, it gets far too much credit, and when the party performs particularly abysmally as it did this past fall, it gets far too much blame. Yes, the $ is helpful, but financial help is also available from the congressional caucus funds in the House and Senate, and any number of PACs.
In a more just world, the outcome would ultimately depend on how the candidate performs on the campaign trail, and how effectively he/she can get the message out – except in the real world, Democrats own the local election machinery, and they are more loyal to THEIR ideology than are the Republicans (whose base is constituted of conservatives, largely by default) because those whose real allegiance is the party of People Who Just Want To Be Left The Hell Alone, aren't ideologues. Small government, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness aren't subject to an ideology – they're just the values that most Americans hold dear.
Unless Harmeet had some serious dirt on the voting donors, McDaniel was always going to win – and even if she had, there would be the question of just what kind of compromise was made that would get enough of them to toss Ronna overboard – it hardly warrants consideration.
That being said, your admonition ought to be tattooed on the forehead of every Republican candidate serious about winning the election (assuming that Republicans CAN win elections, going forward):
"If the GOP starts to focus on the positive and not the negative, they can help save this country from the Left. And it needs to be saved...As long as you’re selling a positive and not a negative, you will attract voters in the middle. Be the sanity party. And then they will fear you."
Spoken from the laptop class, working from home in a service industry. Trump united the so-called nationalists and native capitalists while shoving the multinationalists to the rear by cutting the corporate tax rate in half, de-regulating 10s of thousands of industry killing regulations, and most importantly unleashing American energy for the first time in 40 years. These actions led to organic capital investing in Ameria rather than China, he had to be removed like Nixon.
We were independent, we are now dependent again on everything and the current Uniparty is getting paid to keep it that way.
Sir, I apologize as my language wasn't meant to attack you personally, just to highlight how the media is really misinforming good people like you.
Nancy Mace is a Trump hater without good reason. PBS is the Leftist narrative; 80% of the American People do not support baby killing in the 3rd trimester - like the rest of the world - and the same percentage polls to support women's health in the case of rape or incest or ectopic issues. We have always been that way even though the media has its financial interest to stoke the flames and we need to realize it.
In my 53 years on this earth I have NEVER met or heard a person suggest that a woman should die giving birth - in any country I have lived. Common sense yields that there should be options and that is what most of us subscribe to. We don't, however, subscribe to legalized baby killing at any point as contraception; there are countless options for women in the first 16 weeks to make a choice.
Mace's definition - and perhaps yours - of the 'extreme right' are way off base so please keep in touch as I am one who would meet her false description of it.
Have a great day!
I was afraid the day would come as you hint at: where those depending on one government check or another (eg defense, teachers, welfare, food stamps, fed/stare/local jobs. Etc) would so our number real tax payers that they would turn the country communist/socialist, like China, EU, Africa, Canada, South America.
What a great newsletter. I too am pulling for Dhillon. If the Republican party reelects Ronna McDaniels, they've pretty much signaled what they think of independents like me and what they see themselves as (an underdog party that's happy losing elections and not fulfilling promises as long as the donations keep rolling in, and in fact, that is their raison d'etre).
As for Putin, everyone arguing that we need to keep supplying Ukraine wants two separate paradoxes not to be, well, paradoxes:
(1) Putin is *losing* in Ukraine to a scrappy homegrown poorly equipped military, but somehow he's going to take over the rest of Europe.
(2) Putin is just mad enough to invade Ukraine for no reason and with no exit strategy, but not mad enough to start a nuclear war if he feels cornered.
Those two do not work in any reality and give lie to the idea that we absolutely have to continue supplying Ukraine, or that it's even wise to be waving this red flag in front of this particular bull. We'd be better off dragging Zelensky to the negotiating table and stopping his deadly grift (and, no, I've never trusted him).
Myself and 4 of my brothers served active duty military. Poor kids die while woke rich kids go to college and work for the government or their daddy and mommy.
President Eisenhower warned us of the defense industrial complex.
I think looking at this loss of life and treasure, future historians will label the Russia Hoax as one of the deadliest political decisions ever. Please note that not a single person who is responsible for this has been prosecuted, let alone put in jail. We have a new aristocracy that is above law.
I understand wanting to see Biden impeached – but unless the votes are there, in the Senate, it is a waste of time and $.
I'd be more supportive of finding other ways to hold him accountable.
I am a Conservative and probably disagree with you on many issues and I think your argument for the GOP to focus on the positive rather than dwell on the negative is overly simplistic. There are some very bad things going on that need to be called out. But having said all that, I also believe you have an open mind and we could probably come to some sort of compromise on most of our disagreements.
I absolutely agree that McDaniel needs to be out as head of the RNC. Why anyone would think that she is the best person to lead the party after her disastrous tenure is beyond me. I think you're probably right that Harmeet Dhillon is the best person available for the job.
You might not be a foreign policy expert Sasha but I also think your instincts on the Ukraine war are spot on. We are being lied to by both parties when they say that this a war about democracy. I think Defense Secretary Austin was being honest when he said that the point of this war was to weaken Russia. I have also heard the argument that this war is a bargain for us because for just a few billion dollars we are able to inflict great damage on Russia's ability to wage war. That this war will also end up with the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians (at least) and the annihilation of Ukraine seems to be of little concern. As you mention, there is also the very real risk this war will escalate beyond control causing unimaginable destruction. This is a bad situation which we are making worse. On the contrary Sasha, I wish people would take your advice on this war.
As I said I am a Conservative and also a Republican, but like you recent events have caused me to change my way of looking at things. I am much more skeptical of corporate power now than I used to be and am much less trustworthy of our intelligence and investigative agencies. I think there should be a number of things disillusioned people on both the right and left can agree on. I know the history of third parties is not a happy one and I'm still hoping that the GOP can be changed from within but I'm not sure anymore.
Keep up your good work Sasha!
Thank you. Truly, no one should listen to me when it comes to GOP policy and such since I am only giving my perceptions as a former Democrat. I can't possibly know what would drive votes. And thanks re: the war but I fear there are too many people who seem to want it to head in that direction.
"I can't possibly know what would drive votes."
Well, neither does the GOP – as far as I'm concerned, you are every bit as qualified for the RNC post as anyone.
Wait. I take that back – you have principles, and a conscience, so no, you're not a fit for that job.
Again on the contrary Sasha, you have an open mind (a rare commodity indeed) and common sense and that makes you worth listening to whether you're a former Democrat or not. A long time ago I was also a Democrat (I'm originally from Rhode Island and that was the law) and I've gone through a couple of evolutions in my political thinking. I think the opinions of people who have rethought their positions based on evidence are the people that need to be listened to the most right now.
If only those donors were still interested in protecting American interests rather than chasing 'the unlimited Asia(China) market' while giving away our intellectual property to them for a quick 'cost savings'.
If you think that there aren't ballot control issues in the only country that doesn't have chain-of-custody of our ballot boxes you are extremely out of touch; go be a republican poll watcher in a large metro area next election and report how you were kicked out after they quit counting when a candidate was up 700K votes and then 'lost'. Kari Lake in AZ two months ago.
If you do not care what is happening you have lost once again.
Brilliant comment. The theft was so blatant, so obvious, and affidavits were turned into any place that would receive them. There is no chain of custody of our ballots . That’s why when the voting machines failed to
register the Republican ballots, they were piled up in bags, and handed off TWiCE to some people who are not even named, and sent to a place not even known, and probably were not even opened to count (This
is in Arizona)nor was there probably Republican poll watcher as a witness.
Instead the software for tracking was arranged to say that the ballot had been opened and vote registered, when really the owner of the ballot had only signed in. We all need to get really into this voting malfeasance.
There are Election Deniers because of Election Connivers. I don’t mind being called an Election Denier. Read “Rigged”.
Never watched Jones in my life, fool.
They're probably both very nice people, so absent any serious negatives, the question to ask ourselves is why should we continue to support an individual who has not been able to achieve the goals and objectives for which the job exists. It's like continuing to elect politicians who go to Washington term after term and fail time after time to do the things we sent them there to do....(oh, wait, we do that all the time, don't we?)
And so it will be until “we” change it!
Harmeet is also a FAB hand knitter....she made every sweater that you see her wearing on the tellie : )
Yup, It's time for a change - McDaniels has lost three election cycles in a row....
While I am not registered as a Republican - Texas doesn't register voters by party - I'm much closer to them than to Democrats. As such, I don't give two hoots in a windstorm who is head of the Republican Party. They're mainly a figurehead anyway. As for Dillon, that she is an immigrant may turn people off. (I see that McDaniel won so that's now a moot issue. This brings me to Ukraine.
Now, I've been in a war, I write about war and know what war is about - and I know that Ukraine is NOT our war. It's not "the West's" war either. The problems between Russia and Ukraine are just that, a regional issue dating back for centuries. Blame the Soviets for creating Ukraine in the first place. Putin has accomplished his objectives - driving Ukraine out of Donbas. The ONLY reasons Kiev is still fighting because we keep giving them weapons and because Zelensky is a superstar as you said,. The man is an actor and thinks he has to be center stage. I suspect Ukraine will get tired of him soon and take him out.
I wouldn't worry too much about nuclear war. Putin is not going to use nukes in Ukraine for the same reason the Russian Air Force is not playing a large role - they're being held back for a war with NATO. Nukes are last resort weapons and Russia would only use them as a last resort against the United States and NATO. Hopefully, we won't get the idea we can use them first. For that matter, there is nuclear war and then there is nuclear war. Russia (the United States and others) have low-yield nuclear weapons designed to be used on a battlefield. They could be used without causing worldwide problems. It's the ICBMs and other high yield weapons that are the problem. Russia has the ability to destroy the West. Theoretically, we can destroy them as well but Russia is a large country and their civilization goes back for centuries. We would very likely come out on the losing end. Don't worry about it - the world has been under the threat of nuclear war since 1945.
No, Leftists have not become fascist, they are acting just like the Soviets, Chinese, Vietnamese, Laotian, Cambodians, Cubans and others rooted in Marxism did and do. American Leftists are seeking to become dictators.
Stop saying Republicans lost the last election - they didn't. They now control the House. Biden won't be able to pass another piece of legislation. So what that Democrats control the Senate? There is still one Democrat and a now-Independent who are just as likely to vote with Republicans as with them.
Sam, I always learn at least one thing from you comments and this time I learned 3. Btw - am really enjoying your book and am learning a lot there as well. Thanks much.
This Desert Storm vet thanks you wonderful Vietnam guys and gals for training us and a country to do it right. Welcome Home; we put you guys in the front of our parades.
Your commentary is spot on.
"Texas doesn't register voters by party..."
Just one more reason why I love my adopted home state!
Texas is not the only one. Just under half of the states don't have party registration. Here's an article with a list - https://centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/registering-by-party-where-the-democrats-and-republicans-are-ahead/
Compelling argument and I am now onboard. Kinda funny too that you did a post on Influencers and now just flexed it. Lol. Gonna buy more Mr Pillows (they really are good) and support Dhillon. Btw when the so-called Liberals became the biggest defenders of the FBI, CIA, DOJ, DOD and endless war, they also stopped being liberal or freedom loving.
Please support Mike by buying his very above average products for a very good price. Giza sheets are amazing for the price.
Many thanks for the Mace transcript. I really like her and hope she has a bright future in politics. She'll certainly get some of my money going forward, that is, if any is left after Uncle Zel comes by again.
I think Dhillon was speaking to Representative Mace and voters like you. It was a call to the disgruntled of every viewpoint in the party. She allied herself with the ardent Trump supporters because they were the ones who could challenge the structure. They recognized a true reform candidate or they would have supported Mike Lindell. I don't think she was anyone's tool. The big donors won that race.
I don't think Donald Trump is the face of the Republican Party going forward either. Frankly, I don't know whom to support. I know, with the certain exception of Tulsi Gabbard, the Democrats would ensure our decline as a decent and just society. We need someone to make us believe in the idea of America. I'm am old man so my nostalgia is no vision for our woke and socialist illness.
Thank you for your thoughtful remarks.
Agreed that Harmeet would have been fantastic change of direction for the GOP. It seems that Republicans will never learn. :(
I really wish Ronna wasn’t elected again. I really like that she led Trump’s victory in MI in 2016, but I’m not convinced she’s able to get our candidates over the finish line nationally.
I also like the idea of talking about the positive - what R’s are FOR, not what they are against. Yes, the party has DEEP problems, but some of this is has always been just basic marketing and PR.
People want to feel good about voting for their team. I just don’t get excited voting for R’s because they aren’t as crappy as the Dems. I’ve voted for 3rd parties or not voted in races because both major party candidates just suck and I won’t vote for ‘the less worse candidate’ anymore. If the candidate is bad, they don’t deserve a vote, regardless of party. You can say I was fed up before it was cool.
I just can’t bring myself to say I’m independent because if our candidates actually believed and advocated for the party’s platform, then I wouldn’t have a problem with the party. But candidates need to offer voters more than ‘I’m not a social justice freak’ and ‘tax cuts’. If you can’t make arguments that actually deal with the questions that people are asking, then what are you doing?
People in my generation (X) are a lot more secular and Republicans need to learn the language. You can be culturally conservative w/o being Uber conservative or religious. A lot of my peers have issues with the institutional church and the critiques are well earned and with the younger adults, church isn’t even on the radar. I just don’t think the R’s get the reality of our culture sometimes. They have their bubble and stick to it. I’ve always just wanted to get to 50% + 1 - and that means you need the party to appeal to people outside of the club. And that’s always been the problem ---> They talk a good game about ‘the big tent’, but well, it’s really not that big. They can’t just talk a good game, they need to execute. And usually- they can’t execute.
I doubt Ronna can keep ‘the band’ together ‘for one more election cycle’. Do we really buy that NT’s will vote and work for Trump if he gets the nomination? Independents? I mean, it’s in their name ‘Never’ ‘Trump’. I tend to take them at their word at this point. Do we really believe the Trumpers will support the nominee, if the nominee isn’t Trump? Some might, but I don’t buy we’ll get to 50+ 1, given that it’s Ronna who couldn’t deliver in 18, 20 or 22. I’d love to be proven wrong. I’m just not optimistic.
Too bad she lost. She's a litigator, and the RNC needs more of that awareness in charge.
I wish Harmeet Dhillon could run for president.
Also the American flag comment caught my eye. I lived in a big city for 30 years and towards the end, I’d never have flown an American flag. I just didn’t have the energy to explain I wasn’t a MAGA terrorist or (gasp) a Republican.
My political trajectory follows yours Sasha. I’m out wandering around in the weeds, still a liberal from the 80’s wondering where I can put my “question authority” sticker these days.
I live in the country now and I have my American flag flying. So far no one has cancelled me.
You had me at your positive review of My Pillow. Have been a Stan for Harmmeet for a long time. She is a smart, unflappable attorney.
A
Awesome, Sasha. On Ukraine, just being pragmatic: Putin's win is the globalists' loss. But the losses of this extremely priviledged, wealthy group are nobody else's problem. They help with nothing in any case.
Hmmm... P is certainly doing better economically than Z.
Yeah. Take your meds.
Informative column Sasha, thank you. Many thanks also for approving me on Twitter. We may not see eye to eye on some social issues but it is so satisfying to read commentary that is insightful and attempts to build meaningful dialog and actual trust between people of contending views.
Like you I, a rib rock Republican since the year of our Lord 1992, was truly disappointed in the re election of McDaniels as RNC chair. Reading about her financial excesses was the final act of hubris that made me petition our state committee. The RNC spent so much more on gifts and feting large donors with zero results as opposed to the Democrats. I certainly agreed that we needed people like Dhillon to reach out to independent and dependent moderate voters. The base has to be expanded. We have to realize that a lot of people depend on the federal and state largesse and they vote their pocketbooks when that voting booth curtin is drawn closed MAGA on the outside and love me some SSD on the inside.
We also have to lose some of the establishment voices. Too in step with Democrat war mongers that I feel will be disastrous for our country this year when Ukraine turns sour. Watch President Biden hide behind Lindsey Graham and the Bush Squad when Americans die. Tucker Carlson and Tulsi Gabbard will be the only ones that can say "I told you so" then.
It was obvious, and I thought it was really going to happen, that we needed new leadership and really expand the big tent. The populists were tossed and so we're the small donors. Kinda knew it when the meeting was held at the Waldorf Astoria. It's a club and we ain't in it.