"Nancy Pelosi's son Paul Pelosi Jr. dodges federal charges for the SEVENTH time after being linked to money laundering and mail fraud scheme involving a San Francisco Flop house"
Tulsi Gabbard can't be trusted. Up until very recently, Tulsi Gabbard was a member of Klaus Schwab's "young global leaders forum". She also attempted to join the Council on Foreign Relations several years ago. The CFR is literally one of the most evil organizations on the face of the planet.
A long but interesting article about Tulsi Gabbard and the WEF. She took it off her website when she found out what the WEF is. She has explained this many times and is probably tired of doing so. Try the new “Bing: Chat with AI & GPT-4” from the App Store. They have more and better information than Google.
“Tulsi Gabbard was sent an email in 2015 saying she had been chosen as a Young Global Leader and she sent them a tweet saying she was honored. She never had anything to do with them before or since. But they also posted a picture of her on their website as advertising for their yearly shindig at Davos. The same thing happened to Dan Crenshaw. He never had anything to do with them but they posted a picture of him on their website because at the time he was a hot news topic. So it appears that the purpose of the YGL is to draw more rich people to their shindig by advertising that the rich can meet famous young people in the news. Some chosen as YGL go to Davos and mingle and give talks, others don’t.”
“Tulsi Gabbard and The World Economic Forum - The Whole Story.”
Thanks for the in-depth on that. Whenever I've heard these implied connections I just can't reconcile any part of her supporting the world domination objective of SPECTRE, er, WEF. Like all power mad organizations, it makes perfect sense that Klaus and his comrades would try and incorporate anyone with even a hint of power into their brochures. "They are all with us!" -- right?
I wish though that she would be for forceful in her detractions, as should Vivek. Leave no doubts and no seeds for your enemy.
So are Stefanik, Tom Cotton, Nikki Haley, Ivanka Trump, and near every Deep State, Corporate and Dem representative. Tulsi , Vivek RFK Jr,DeSantis have the guts to call out the evil by name.on the public stage.The rest of the duopoly, no matter their ideological bullshit stridency won’t.They’re either corrupt, cowardly, craven or clueless. Any of the aforementioned categories make them complicit.
I’ve heard that, but agree with Seva’s comment above. Tulsi has been consistent her entire political career, hence my point about her integrity. Just listen to her many interviews, especially this one as it’s fantastic. Tulsi is a real one, and I should know because I’m Gabe Real. 😁
I was skeptical of her, but after listening to the interview, I think she has learned and evolved. I'd be ok with her for Trump's VP. Would probably help him with the so-called "moderate/suburban" voters.
I have to say, my opinion of Tulsi has gone way up after this interview! She reminds me a bit of Kari Lake in her straight forward manner of speaking. I’ll be watching her more closely now!
Donald Trump if he wins only has one term, the VP he picks will carry out a lot of his policies afterwards and won't take any crap. That VP should be Gabbard. She is smart, looks great, has a wealth of experience, has no time for the neocons and DC eltes that currently are running America into the ground. She is her own person, nothing phoney and quite humble, a quality that is most rare in a politician. Being hated by the Democratic leadership is a badge of homnour. Her debating the inept Harris would be like a hungry German Shepherd on a T-bone.
Agreed, Tulsi would be a top drawer VP pic either for Trump or RFK. She has great crossover appeal, and is definitely ready to be president should something happen. I am really really hoping that Trump goes with Tulsi.
Yes, she was for a long time a Democrat, but wasn't that true of so many of us these days?
My favorite for vp would be Vivek. No one hits harder than him. It’s always a great pleasure to see him mop the floor with these morons in the msm who attempt to debate him. He also understands tech quite well and could work with Elon on guiding AI. Tulsi would be good though. Very intelligent, sane and honest and could even be a good president.
Vivek is out of the running. He’s being given a different cabinet post.
Tulsi has the “ It Factor” and draws support across the spectrum. She also calm. The GOP cannot win with a different pick. A true Independent is desperately needed and a former Dem knows the ins and outs of the game better than any lifelong Republican/Conservative. She also attracts Gen Z, women, men, minorities and voters turned off by both parties. She’s got the Milei appeal.
I like Vivek, but he’s too controversial and similar to Trump. Tulsi has more broad appeal and is more balanced and nuanced, and may bring in more votes from women and minorities, since identity politics is such a thing these days. Plus she has experience in Congress as well as the military. She checks all the boxes and as I said above she’d make an excellent VP choice. I’d love to see a Trump/Tulsi presidency, with cabinet positions offered to Vivek and RFK, Jr. One can dream, right?
"In an apparent response, Gabbard posted her interview on The Hill TV's Rising segment on Monday. In it, she declined to explain her neutral vote on impeachment but maintained that the president's foreign policy decisions were counter to American interests and national security.
"Look, there is no question in my mind that Donald Trump is unfit to serve as president and commander in chief. I've said this over and over again," Gabbard told hosts Krystal Ball and Saagar Enjeti. "I am running for president to defeat him for that reason.
"He launched an illegal and unconstitutional attack launching missiles into Syria," Gabbard continued. "We don't see any of the talk in Congress about that."
She added that the president also tore up the Iran nuclear agreement and brought the United States closer to war with that nation."
One of Trump's biggest weaknesses is picking people who stab him in the back at every opportunity. I'm not going to say she hasn't changed, but it would behoove him to pick someone who will both help him win, and not be a turncoat. I have no doubt she would do the former...the latter though...Tulsi is a walking talking catch-22.
Everybody Trump surrounded himself with, but for those who were purged said they hated him. Including Pence, Haley, Wray, Haspel, McMaster, Tillerson, Sessions,Tillerson, Cruz, Meadows, Graham, Kerner and the RNC.
Bannon wanted him to appoint Tulsi to his cabinet in 2016. So did Flynn, Farage and his true supporters.He should have.
So what? Trump didn’t do himself any favors. Lousy appointment picks, lousy advisors and constantly picking fights , ad hominem attacks. She would likely be equipped to stifle his lack of impulse control.
I’d love to see Trump with Gabbard take office and once seated, flip Independent.
Launching missiles into another country, when not in self-defense - and I don't recall any Syrian military actions against the US at that time - is an act of war. There is a Constitutional means for entering into a state of war, and thereafter prosecuting said war. There was no declaration of war against Syria, therefore that action was unconstitutional, and thereby, illegal. In fact, every war the US has been in, since 1942, when the US declared war on Romania (as a signatory to the Axis Pact) has been unconstitutional and thus illegal - and that includes Korea, Vietnam, Kuwait, Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Cambodia, Laos, numerous wars in Africa, Kosovo, and undoubtedly quite a few others which may be classified. So Gabbard, according to the Constitution, is correct, and people in power who are sworn to uphold the Constitution, and act contrary to it, are by definition, unfit to hold office.
I must wonder to what extent Trump had actual control over the military, and made the decision to launch those missiles, or whether the decision was made for him by others, the same others, perhaps, who negated his policy directive as Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces, to withdraw US troops from Syria. That's something that Ms Gabbard should comment upon, because if the power to make that decision was effectively taken from him, that sets up the question of who is running the government in actuality.
Tulsi Gabbard is a national treasure! I would love to see her as Trump's VP, but I don't think that is a realistic possibility. Whatever roll she is given in the future, whether it be in a Trump administration, or somewhere else, I have no doubt that she will fill it with honesty, integrity and humility.
“A loss to the dems who have no idea how good she is.”
Not only do they not have any idea how good she is, but they despise her and feel she’s betraying the country by criticizing the democrats so harshly. A good example of how profoundly divided this society is. If we can’t even agree on the basics that Tulsi so clearly lays out then how can we ever again function as a country and if America so badly fails with all its advantages then what country can succeed? How can our global civilization succeed if a country like America fails as the world watches online?
Tulsi has risen from the shithole of the Democratic Party after tossing grenades at HC. She has been enlightened to the demise of the party and the reconnoiter both parties are corrupted. She speaks truth to power. Including to Trump. He needs her on the ticket.
Truly horrifying and what does this disaster say about human nature? This is why I’m so big on AI. We have so many problems so out of control, as Tulsi pointed out we’re even rapidly heading for WW3, that it seems to me only AI will be powerful enough to save us. Everything is moving faster and faster so we’ll soon see how this works out.
The GOP has no idea what a gift they’ve been given. “ We The People” love her, The powers that be hate her and hate “ We The People”. We’re useful idiots when it’s election time and collateral damage once in office. The lockstep ideological demands of both parties has completely hollowed out the center of the country. Those who want pragmatism, prosperity, peace and to be heard.
I swear, I've never heard a politician that is so in line with my own principles. I'm mighty proud of my write-in vote for Tulsi in 2020. TBH, I hope she is not Trump's running mate (DNC-Media will be cruel and malicious with her), but I hope she runs again in 2028 and again in 2032 and if need be, in 2036.
Long piece but she outlines her personal journey away from the Democrat party. Basically, it is opposition to the forever wars. That accounts for her flirtation with Bernie as well. Only non-interventionist voice in the Democrat party, albeit a weak one. She would be a useful ally in purging the war mongers from the Republican Party (She just took a shot at Mittens.) I would be nervous about VP until her bona fides are better established but Sec. Def might be a good fit.
Anti-warmongering is huge for me because of how much damage this near endless warfare has done to our people, debt, economy and standing in the world. It’s crack for neocons. I like Tulsi a lot.
While so many are ripping on Tulsi ( without listening) as a “ WEF Puppet”, guess what? There are plenty in the GOP. Including Nikki Haley, Tom Cotton, Elise Stefanik, Ivanka Trump,Robert Kadlec, Peter Thiel ( who Mike Gallagher is leaving office to work for), Scott Gottlieb, Nick Ayres( Pence’s former assistant), Adam KinzingerMaria Bartiromo,Paul Ryan, the family Bush, Daryl Issa, appears Brian Kemp has joined the ranks, Chris Wray, Steve Forbes
Nearly the entirety of the Deep State, Biden admin, MSM Corporate media,Dem Party and donor class are WEF.
The Chinabot McKinsey and Carlyle affiliates cross party lines equally.
The U.S. is endemically corrupt and captured, hence very seldom will somebody in the political arena speak out.
The few who have done so while in office campaigning for office or no longer in office are DeSantis,Gabbard, Ramaswamy,RFK Jr., Gaffney, Trump( didn’t realize how deep the ties went or the blowback he’d face). Everybody in the public arena, left, right , center, crazy,sane is met with punishment. Glenn Beck, Brett Weinstein, Tucker, Taibbi, Elon Musk, Mike Flynn, Greenwald, Iversen, Neil Oliver, Farage, Mark Steyn, Vivek, KT McFarlane, Jon Solomon, Russell Brand, Jimmy Dore, Bannon, Roger Stone, IanMiles Cheong, Roseanne Barr, Charlie Kirk, Kucinich, Jeffrey Lord, Wayne Root, Del Bigtree,Jeffrey Tucker, Lohn Leake, Sharyl Attkisson, Lara Logan, Sidney Powell, Raheem Kassam, Rogan, Eric Clapton, Morrissey, Majiid Nawaz, Tony Shaffer, Jim Hanson, Dave Reaboi, Fred Fleitz, Wendy Bell,Giuliani, Kash Patel, Rabbi Boteach, Archbishop Vigano, Mark Marano, Peter Pry, Rogan,Lex Fridman, Posobiec, Pearson Sharpe, Michael Savage, Laura Ingraham,RFK Jr., Naomi Wolf, Brigitte Gabriel, David Horowitz, Michael Horowitz, Ami Horowitz, Robb Schmitt, Drs. Ness, Risch, Malone, Kuldorff, Ladapo, Cole, Robert Epstein, Hatfill, Osqui,Smith, Gold, Stella, Levitt,Zelenko,MontagnierYeadon…
It no longer matters where one stands in the political ideological spectrum, but who dares stand up to.
I wish to God there was a “ We The People Party”. Where every voice was heard and we could have discussions, compromise and unite as Americans. The hatred and divide is untenable and a well manipulated and orchestrated distraction from the Brave New World. A tyrannical, transhuman technocracy. The end of all things free.
With any bit of good fortune or divine intervention, Gabbard will be Veep and subsequently, President Gabbard
Thank you for this terrific list of men and women whose characters are defined by integrity, which I will likely use in one of my first upcoming Substack posts. Truly. Thank you, Gail.
Yeah, the WEF is seriously seductive and can draw in a number of people who would naturally be opponents of the New World Order. Even the foremost enemy of the globalists, Vladimir Putin was at one time affiliated with them.
I would approach her with caution (not too long ago she was supporting Bernie Sanders after all) but I think that she is an interesting person on the scene and very much worth listening to. Thanks for posting the interview.
Sanders was my biggest concern, but she explained it adequately. From several comments in the interview, I suspect she's learned a little something about free market economics.
She probably believed all the bs put out about how necessary the lockdown was. I recently saw a clip of Joe Rogan talking to Abigail Shrier and he said he used to pretty much believe what the CDC and others in the healthcare field said but Covid changed all that.
And if she believed it, she is not fit to govern. I’m like a really regular person, and I saw through the propaganda after about two weeks. Many others did too. She’s suppose to a lot more enlightened than us regular folks being as she wants to rule, oops, I work for us. It’s the same excuse I hear over and over. “They trusted the science “
“How was they to know..”
maybe we should stop electing ignorant educated people into office.
Start voting for people with some damn commonsense. Commonsense to know what natural immunity is, and that Covid didn’t change all that.
Tulsi is a certified Goddess. There, I'm just going to say it. Her and Trump would make a formidable team. And if nothing else, a debate between Tulsi and Kamala would be Rumble In The Jungle epic. Ten to one Kamala would be in tears before it was over.
"I have been to the Middle East. It is in the middle. Of the east."
"Yes, madam Vice President, but have you ever carried an fired an AK-47 in the Middle East?"
On the subject of corruption in Congress:
"Nancy Pelosi's son Paul Pelosi Jr. dodges federal charges for the SEVENTH time after being linked to money laundering and mail fraud scheme involving a San Francisco Flop house"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13023467/Nancy-Pelosi-son-Paul-Pelosi-Jr-charges-federal-case.html
Another Fortunate Son born wearing golden skates.
I like Tulsi too, she’s a woman of integrity. She would make an excellent VP choice.
Tulsi Gabbard can't be trusted. Up until very recently, Tulsi Gabbard was a member of Klaus Schwab's "young global leaders forum". She also attempted to join the Council on Foreign Relations several years ago. The CFR is literally one of the most evil organizations on the face of the planet.
A long but interesting article about Tulsi Gabbard and the WEF. She took it off her website when she found out what the WEF is. She has explained this many times and is probably tired of doing so. Try the new “Bing: Chat with AI & GPT-4” from the App Store. They have more and better information than Google.
“Tulsi Gabbard was sent an email in 2015 saying she had been chosen as a Young Global Leader and she sent them a tweet saying she was honored. She never had anything to do with them before or since. But they also posted a picture of her on their website as advertising for their yearly shindig at Davos. The same thing happened to Dan Crenshaw. He never had anything to do with them but they posted a picture of him on their website because at the time he was a hot news topic. So it appears that the purpose of the YGL is to draw more rich people to their shindig by advertising that the rich can meet famous young people in the news. Some chosen as YGL go to Davos and mingle and give talks, others don’t.”
“Tulsi Gabbard and The World Economic Forum - The Whole Story.”
By Pam Ho. Oct 12, 2022
https://pamho.medium.com/tulsi-gabbard-and-the-world-economic-forum-the-whole-story-4fca2e9fbf7d
Ditto Vivek Ramaswamy.
Exactly what I was going to say.
Thanks for the in-depth on that. Whenever I've heard these implied connections I just can't reconcile any part of her supporting the world domination objective of SPECTRE, er, WEF. Like all power mad organizations, it makes perfect sense that Klaus and his comrades would try and incorporate anyone with even a hint of power into their brochures. "They are all with us!" -- right?
I wish though that she would be for forceful in her detractions, as should Vivek. Leave no doubts and no seeds for your enemy.
So are Stefanik, Tom Cotton, Nikki Haley, Ivanka Trump, and near every Deep State, Corporate and Dem representative. Tulsi , Vivek RFK Jr,DeSantis have the guts to call out the evil by name.on the public stage.The rest of the duopoly, no matter their ideological bullshit stridency won’t.They’re either corrupt, cowardly, craven or clueless. Any of the aforementioned categories make them complicit.
I’ve heard that, but agree with Seva’s comment above. Tulsi has been consistent her entire political career, hence my point about her integrity. Just listen to her many interviews, especially this one as it’s fantastic. Tulsi is a real one, and I should know because I’m Gabe Real. 😁
She has learned from the mistakes of her youth.
I was skeptical of her, but after listening to the interview, I think she has learned and evolved. I'd be ok with her for Trump's VP. Would probably help him with the so-called "moderate/suburban" voters.
I'm a lifelong libertarian and believe integrity is the most important human character attribute. I would trust her with my life.
I have to say, my opinion of Tulsi has gone way up after this interview! She reminds me a bit of Kari Lake in her straight forward manner of speaking. I’ll be watching her more closely now!
Kari and Tulsi are such badasses
Tulsi can win. Kari Lake can’t.
We’ll see who he picks!
That was indeed a fantastic interview!
Donald Trump if he wins only has one term, the VP he picks will carry out a lot of his policies afterwards and won't take any crap. That VP should be Gabbard. She is smart, looks great, has a wealth of experience, has no time for the neocons and DC eltes that currently are running America into the ground. She is her own person, nothing phoney and quite humble, a quality that is most rare in a politician. Being hated by the Democratic leadership is a badge of homnour. Her debating the inept Harris would be like a hungry German Shepherd on a T-bone.
Amen!
Agreed, Tulsi would be a top drawer VP pic either for Trump or RFK. She has great crossover appeal, and is definitely ready to be president should something happen. I am really really hoping that Trump goes with Tulsi.
Yes, she was for a long time a Democrat, but wasn't that true of so many of us these days?
My favorite for vp would be Vivek. No one hits harder than him. It’s always a great pleasure to see him mop the floor with these morons in the msm who attempt to debate him. He also understands tech quite well and could work with Elon on guiding AI. Tulsi would be good though. Very intelligent, sane and honest and could even be a good president.
Vivek is out of the running. He’s being given a different cabinet post.
Tulsi has the “ It Factor” and draws support across the spectrum. She also calm. The GOP cannot win with a different pick. A true Independent is desperately needed and a former Dem knows the ins and outs of the game better than any lifelong Republican/Conservative. She also attracts Gen Z, women, men, minorities and voters turned off by both parties. She’s got the Milei appeal.
I like Vivek, but he’s too controversial and similar to Trump. Tulsi has more broad appeal and is more balanced and nuanced, and may bring in more votes from women and minorities, since identity politics is such a thing these days. Plus she has experience in Congress as well as the military. She checks all the boxes and as I said above she’d make an excellent VP choice. I’d love to see a Trump/Tulsi presidency, with cabinet positions offered to Vivek and RFK, Jr. One can dream, right?
I hadn’t thought about Tulsi as RFKs veep. That would be a formidable combo.
Right, he really screwed that up and lost my vote and so many others. 😞
You are a blessing Sasha, please keep up the good work, you are a blessing to many more than you know
Also maybe you want to check our Dr. Mercola’s latest stack on shadow government
https://www.newsweek.com/tulsi-gabbard-says-donald-trump-unfit-serve-after-president-commends-her-voting-present-impeachment-1478855
"In an apparent response, Gabbard posted her interview on The Hill TV's Rising segment on Monday. In it, she declined to explain her neutral vote on impeachment but maintained that the president's foreign policy decisions were counter to American interests and national security.
"Look, there is no question in my mind that Donald Trump is unfit to serve as president and commander in chief. I've said this over and over again," Gabbard told hosts Krystal Ball and Saagar Enjeti. "I am running for president to defeat him for that reason.
"He launched an illegal and unconstitutional attack launching missiles into Syria," Gabbard continued. "We don't see any of the talk in Congress about that."
She added that the president also tore up the Iran nuclear agreement and brought the United States closer to war with that nation."
One of Trump's biggest weaknesses is picking people who stab him in the back at every opportunity. I'm not going to say she hasn't changed, but it would behoove him to pick someone who will both help him win, and not be a turncoat. I have no doubt she would do the former...the latter though...Tulsi is a walking talking catch-22.
Yes, but how does one tell, exactly, who will be a turncoat and who won't? That's what I want to know.
Tulsi is battle-tested.
I am just saying based on her past comments, I would take issue with choosing her as VP. When someone tells me they hate me...I listen.
Everybody Trump surrounded himself with, but for those who were purged said they hated him. Including Pence, Haley, Wray, Haspel, McMaster, Tillerson, Sessions,Tillerson, Cruz, Meadows, Graham, Kerner and the RNC.
Bannon wanted him to appoint Tulsi to his cabinet in 2016. So did Flynn, Farage and his true supporters.He should have.
So what? Trump didn’t do himself any favors. Lousy appointment picks, lousy advisors and constantly picking fights , ad hominem attacks. She would likely be equipped to stifle his lack of impulse control.
I’d love to see Trump with Gabbard take office and once seated, flip Independent.
Launching missiles into another country, when not in self-defense - and I don't recall any Syrian military actions against the US at that time - is an act of war. There is a Constitutional means for entering into a state of war, and thereafter prosecuting said war. There was no declaration of war against Syria, therefore that action was unconstitutional, and thereby, illegal. In fact, every war the US has been in, since 1942, when the US declared war on Romania (as a signatory to the Axis Pact) has been unconstitutional and thus illegal - and that includes Korea, Vietnam, Kuwait, Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Cambodia, Laos, numerous wars in Africa, Kosovo, and undoubtedly quite a few others which may be classified. So Gabbard, according to the Constitution, is correct, and people in power who are sworn to uphold the Constitution, and act contrary to it, are by definition, unfit to hold office.
I must wonder to what extent Trump had actual control over the military, and made the decision to launch those missiles, or whether the decision was made for him by others, the same others, perhaps, who negated his policy directive as Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces, to withdraw US troops from Syria. That's something that Ms Gabbard should comment upon, because if the power to make that decision was effectively taken from him, that sets up the question of who is running the government in actuality.
I am aware. That was their quote, not mine. It wasn't the focus of that copy\paste.
Trump was literally trying to enact his campaign platforms and govern with a gun to the back of his head.
I’m not sure you know what “literally” means.
Tulsi Gabbard is a national treasure! I would love to see her as Trump's VP, but I don't think that is a realistic possibility. Whatever roll she is given in the future, whether it be in a Trump administration, or somewhere else, I have no doubt that she will fill it with honesty, integrity and humility.
Why isn’t it a realistic possibility? Trump would be wise to pick her as his running mate!
He’d be an idiot. Y’all really are gullible. And no, he doesn’t have to pick a women just because that is trending right now.
Formidable lady. A loss to the dems who have no idea how good she is.
Amr Australia.
“A loss to the dems who have no idea how good she is.”
Not only do they not have any idea how good she is, but they despise her and feel she’s betraying the country by criticizing the democrats so harshly. A good example of how profoundly divided this society is. If we can’t even agree on the basics that Tulsi so clearly lays out then how can we ever again function as a country and if America so badly fails with all its advantages then what country can succeed? How can our global civilization succeed if a country like America fails as the world watches online?
From Australia I watch with dismay at what dems are doing to USA
Tulsi has risen from the shithole of the Democratic Party after tossing grenades at HC. She has been enlightened to the demise of the party and the reconnoiter both parties are corrupted. She speaks truth to power. Including to Trump. He needs her on the ticket.
Well said!
Truly horrifying and what does this disaster say about human nature? This is why I’m so big on AI. We have so many problems so out of control, as Tulsi pointed out we’re even rapidly heading for WW3, that it seems to me only AI will be powerful enough to save us. Everything is moving faster and faster so we’ll soon see how this works out.
The GOP has no idea what a gift they’ve been given. “ We The People” love her, The powers that be hate her and hate “ We The People”. We’re useful idiots when it’s election time and collateral damage once in office. The lockstep ideological demands of both parties has completely hollowed out the center of the country. Those who want pragmatism, prosperity, peace and to be heard.
I swear, I've never heard a politician that is so in line with my own principles. I'm mighty proud of my write-in vote for Tulsi in 2020. TBH, I hope she is not Trump's running mate (DNC-Media will be cruel and malicious with her), but I hope she runs again in 2028 and again in 2032 and if need be, in 2036.
Long piece but she outlines her personal journey away from the Democrat party. Basically, it is opposition to the forever wars. That accounts for her flirtation with Bernie as well. Only non-interventionist voice in the Democrat party, albeit a weak one. She would be a useful ally in purging the war mongers from the Republican Party (She just took a shot at Mittens.) I would be nervous about VP until her bona fides are better established but Sec. Def might be a good fit.
Anti-warmongering is huge for me because of how much damage this near endless warfare has done to our people, debt, economy and standing in the world. It’s crack for neocons. I like Tulsi a lot.
Also RFK2, J D Vance, Rand Paul, Vivek.
While so many are ripping on Tulsi ( without listening) as a “ WEF Puppet”, guess what? There are plenty in the GOP. Including Nikki Haley, Tom Cotton, Elise Stefanik, Ivanka Trump,Robert Kadlec, Peter Thiel ( who Mike Gallagher is leaving office to work for), Scott Gottlieb, Nick Ayres( Pence’s former assistant), Adam KinzingerMaria Bartiromo,Paul Ryan, the family Bush, Daryl Issa, appears Brian Kemp has joined the ranks, Chris Wray, Steve Forbes
Nearly the entirety of the Deep State, Biden admin, MSM Corporate media,Dem Party and donor class are WEF.
The Chinabot McKinsey and Carlyle affiliates cross party lines equally.
The U.S. is endemically corrupt and captured, hence very seldom will somebody in the political arena speak out.
The few who have done so while in office campaigning for office or no longer in office are DeSantis,Gabbard, Ramaswamy,RFK Jr., Gaffney, Trump( didn’t realize how deep the ties went or the blowback he’d face). Everybody in the public arena, left, right , center, crazy,sane is met with punishment. Glenn Beck, Brett Weinstein, Tucker, Taibbi, Elon Musk, Mike Flynn, Greenwald, Iversen, Neil Oliver, Farage, Mark Steyn, Vivek, KT McFarlane, Jon Solomon, Russell Brand, Jimmy Dore, Bannon, Roger Stone, IanMiles Cheong, Roseanne Barr, Charlie Kirk, Kucinich, Jeffrey Lord, Wayne Root, Del Bigtree,Jeffrey Tucker, Lohn Leake, Sharyl Attkisson, Lara Logan, Sidney Powell, Raheem Kassam, Rogan, Eric Clapton, Morrissey, Majiid Nawaz, Tony Shaffer, Jim Hanson, Dave Reaboi, Fred Fleitz, Wendy Bell,Giuliani, Kash Patel, Rabbi Boteach, Archbishop Vigano, Mark Marano, Peter Pry, Rogan,Lex Fridman, Posobiec, Pearson Sharpe, Michael Savage, Laura Ingraham,RFK Jr., Naomi Wolf, Brigitte Gabriel, David Horowitz, Michael Horowitz, Ami Horowitz, Robb Schmitt, Drs. Ness, Risch, Malone, Kuldorff, Ladapo, Cole, Robert Epstein, Hatfill, Osqui,Smith, Gold, Stella, Levitt,Zelenko,MontagnierYeadon…
It no longer matters where one stands in the political ideological spectrum, but who dares stand up to.
I wish to God there was a “ We The People Party”. Where every voice was heard and we could have discussions, compromise and unite as Americans. The hatred and divide is untenable and a well manipulated and orchestrated distraction from the Brave New World. A tyrannical, transhuman technocracy. The end of all things free.
With any bit of good fortune or divine intervention, Gabbard will be Veep and subsequently, President Gabbard
Thank you for this terrific list of men and women whose characters are defined by integrity, which I will likely use in one of my first upcoming Substack posts. Truly. Thank you, Gail.
You’re most welcome! Permanent DC and the fringe on both sides have found a commonality. Hating Woodstock. 😂
"Hating Woodstock"??
Consider Ron and Rand Paul as well, please.
Of course! No question.
Yeah, the WEF is seriously seductive and can draw in a number of people who would naturally be opponents of the New World Order. Even the foremost enemy of the globalists, Vladimir Putin was at one time affiliated with them.
I would approach her with caution (not too long ago she was supporting Bernie Sanders after all) but I think that she is an interesting person on the scene and very much worth listening to. Thanks for posting the interview.
Sanders was my biggest concern, but she explained it adequately. From several comments in the interview, I suspect she's learned a little something about free market economics.
I want to see her apologize for being a mouthpiece of the WEF re. Covid jabs. She seems like a chameleon in so many ways.
She was never a mouthpiece for the WEF and even Vivek trusted the government enough to get the vaccine and a booster.
If they pushed jabs, they can’t be trusted. This includes Trump. However, I’d take Trump any day over FJB.
It is interesting how these so called leader can be so naive and ignorant about so much, while us little people see through the BS plain as day.
News Flash: They are not that ignorant. Trump puts on a good show. FJB doesn’t.
Im a little concerned about her stance on covid lockdowns, contact tracing and overall stance on spying.
She probably believed all the bs put out about how necessary the lockdown was. I recently saw a clip of Joe Rogan talking to Abigail Shrier and he said he used to pretty much believe what the CDC and others in the healthcare field said but Covid changed all that.
Smart people learn from experience. Tulsi is a smart person.
And if she believed it, she is not fit to govern. I’m like a really regular person, and I saw through the propaganda after about two weeks. Many others did too. She’s suppose to a lot more enlightened than us regular folks being as she wants to rule, oops, I work for us. It’s the same excuse I hear over and over. “They trusted the science “
“How was they to know..”
maybe we should stop electing ignorant educated people into office.
Start voting for people with some damn commonsense. Commonsense to know what natural immunity is, and that Covid didn’t change all that.
Tulsi is a certified Goddess. There, I'm just going to say it. Her and Trump would make a formidable team. And if nothing else, a debate between Tulsi and Kamala would be Rumble In The Jungle epic. Ten to one Kamala would be in tears before it was over.
"I have been to the Middle East. It is in the middle. Of the east."
"Yes, madam Vice President, but have you ever carried an fired an AK-47 in the Middle East?"