"There is undisputed proof, at least among those outside the maga bubble linking Trump to his crimes..."
It's not even clear that Trump's "crimes" are even crimes. Not even the NYT and other Trump haters think the Bragg indictment is serious. And the "documents" case is clearly a witch hunt. I would be shocked if any court, given the ruling in the Clinton case, could come to any conclusion that Trump keeping documents was any different than any previous POTUS. As far as the J6 "insurrection" garbage, that's a joke.
But none of this compares to Biden influence peddling. That's an actual crime, which is why the Dems and the MSM are trying to downplay it.
As I've said to you before, it is clear that from day one of Trump being elected there has been a concerted and deceitful attempt to bring him down. Anyone who at this point cannot acknowledge that the whole "Russiagate" thing - where he was accused of being a "Kremlin asset" - was concocted from whole cloth is not being honest.
It is precisely because of this PROVEN massive lie that we must look at any subsequent attempts to "get Trump" with more than a healthy dose of skepticism. The Bragg indictment is so flimsy that it's laughable. What it really shows is that there is an ongoing attempt to bury Trump and prevent him from reaching the WH. That he is Biden's chief political rival and that it is the Dems who are indicting him should be cause for outrage from any fair-minded person. I'm not a Trump voter but this malarkey is bloody outrageous - again, because it has been clearly PROVEN that the whole "Russiagate" thing was a sham.
None of this has anyting to do with Biden's crimes, which are about as straightforward as it gets. I want the evidence of those crimes meticulously investigated and clearly laid out for all to see.
I would ask you the same thing I asked another Biden defender:
Explain to us how Hunter - with zero expertise in anything - got a lavish salary from Burisma as Joe was threatening withholding U.S. funds from Ukraine unless they fired the prosecutor who was investigating Burisma.
This is as clear and unambiguous a quid pro quo as there is.
The latest testimony that showed Hunter repeatedly involving daddy in his business dealings ("Say hi to these nice people, dad!") is only icing on the cake. The pattern of influence peddling is as plain as day. That's a crime.
"There is undisputed proof, at least among those outside the maga bubble linking Trump to his crimes..."
It's not even clear that Trump's "crimes" are even crimes. Not even the NYT and other Trump haters think the Bragg indictment is serious. And the "documents" case is clearly a witch hunt. I would be shocked if any court, given the ruling in the Clinton case, could come to any conclusion that Trump keeping documents was any different than any previous POTUS. As far as the J6 "insurrection" garbage, that's a joke.
But none of this compares to Biden influence peddling. That's an actual crime, which is why the Dems and the MSM are trying to downplay it.
As I've said to you before, it is clear that from day one of Trump being elected there has been a concerted and deceitful attempt to bring him down. Anyone who at this point cannot acknowledge that the whole "Russiagate" thing - where he was accused of being a "Kremlin asset" - was concocted from whole cloth is not being honest.
It is precisely because of this PROVEN massive lie that we must look at any subsequent attempts to "get Trump" with more than a healthy dose of skepticism. The Bragg indictment is so flimsy that it's laughable. What it really shows is that there is an ongoing attempt to bury Trump and prevent him from reaching the WH. That he is Biden's chief political rival and that it is the Dems who are indicting him should be cause for outrage from any fair-minded person. I'm not a Trump voter but this malarkey is bloody outrageous - again, because it has been clearly PROVEN that the whole "Russiagate" thing was a sham.
None of this has anyting to do with Biden's crimes, which are about as straightforward as it gets. I want the evidence of those crimes meticulously investigated and clearly laid out for all to see.
I would ask you the same thing I asked another Biden defender:
Explain to us how Hunter - with zero expertise in anything - got a lavish salary from Burisma as Joe was threatening withholding U.S. funds from Ukraine unless they fired the prosecutor who was investigating Burisma.
This is as clear and unambiguous a quid pro quo as there is.
The latest testimony that showed Hunter repeatedly involving daddy in his business dealings ("Say hi to these nice people, dad!") is only icing on the cake. The pattern of influence peddling is as plain as day. That's a crime.