7 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Our Constitution grants every US Citizen a right to unrestricted travel. Anyone blocking roads is therefore violating your Constitutional rights - a form of "kidnapping" or at least restraint. While I don't necessarily fall completely into the camp saying "just run them over" (which, if you feel threatened, is covered your right to self defense - but be prepared for leftitst to persecute and prosecute you anyway), I do strongly believe that the police have a right to use immediate force to incarcerate such terrorists with no discussion.

"...and you can speak your mind - but not on my time!" - Billy Joel

Expand full comment

agreed. this was worse than making your point and getting the media coverage, worse than even knocking out all the windows on (innocent) Market Street mom and pop stores, because when it took hours, and the local mole people had rare sunshine (from Houston perspective), there could have been deaths.

again, I am sympathetic to the anti-(forever) war thought, though. the blue team media now charges the red team with 'isolationism', and has only the congress people on who are advocating essentially war on three different continents including Asia. ((r) next to his name Lawlor went on about China buying things from Iran means China is as bad as Iran. (so does that mean, everything we buy, what about when we buy oil from the beheading Arab nations?). the only peace dem, was forced out of the blue team, and on the day, he qualified for the Michigan ballot, EVERY blue state media channel wanted to talk to his family who prefers Biden. plus, did you know since 2023 (that's what the selective service registry new law says--you want to call it a Biden law, I'm fine with that...), 18 year males only, (geez, maybe going trans is an option...) are forced to register for the draft again, or else threat threat threat. that's what the thing in the mail to two of my teen male kids just said. you think the blue team media (with one of us in office) would question US entering into WWIII? you know, as leader of the free world, to protect our friends, to prevent all the baddies from ....whatever it was, we prevented Vietnam/Iraq/and Afghanistan from doing with our kids' deaths... ? If my blue team has no civil liberties and cannot be anti-war, then ef my blue team.

Expand full comment

Take the red pill. Be free.

Expand full comment

what a culty thing to say!

btw, does someone know the stated reason that the US vetoed the 12 nations that voted to let Palestine have a vote in the U.N.? I understand they usually don't let such votes even happen, but this time they did, and they vetoed. wouldn't that be a good opportunity to say,

'we stand with the peaceful non-hamas Palestine--? But they can't even have a vote? Why is the United States (war-machine?) so anti-free speech and democratic voting?

Expand full comment

That's a self-answering question. Nobody give a "vote" to a group of terrorists who are not a nation.

Expand full comment

I do appreciate that they lost a war that they started, about more than one/half century ago. But how are the Palestinians currently seated at the United Nations 'terrorists'? Don't they have a right to exist?

Expand full comment

There is no country called "Palestine," and never has been. Therefore, there is no such thing as a "Palestinian." There is no common language, culture, genetic history, etc.

The fiction of Palestine is the Middle East's revenge for other Western successes, trying to elevate an anti-Semite group of terrorists to the status of "country" to continue to conduct their proxy war against Israel.

Expand full comment